Office of Personnel Management

One of the ways in which DOGE surprised everybody was how it turned a relatively sleepy agency into a weapon against the entire government bureaucracy. Created by law in 1978, OPM’s main role before now was to standardize government policies around personnel and to offer shared services for human capital like the federal health plans. It also tracks all the paperwork around hiring, promotions, changes and retirement. And so, for most federal staff, their main interactions with OPM were receiving paperwork they were hired, fired or retired; or picking a health plan; or looking at the rules around various practices. But, all the other aspects of human resources were handled by their own agencies. Federal staff are hired to their specific agencies, their performance rankings are defined by their agency, they’re promoted by their agencies, they’re paid by their agencies, they follow the HR policies of their agencies. OPM provides the guidance, but it’s the agencies that implement it. This is why OPM’s turn towards the dark side has been so confounding. Very early on, DOGE concentrated a large number of staff within OPM to capture control of the centralized databases and install a new email server to send/receive messages from every federal worker. The acting director was forced out and replaced by Charles Ezell, who then let DOGE wall off an area and keep out permanent agency staff. DOGE also brought in a slew of HR executives from startups who seemingly expected the agency to work for the entire federal government in the same way that HR operates within a single company. And so, they started acting like OPM had more centralized authority: ordering workers to the “five things” email; blasting commands to human capital officers at other agencies; asking for lists of workers so they could command agencies to fire probationary workers and short-cut established procedures for reductions in force. OPM used to be deliberative and formal with its rulemaking - the new OPM was fond of sending out memos to all agencies on Wednesdays demanding a response by Friday. None of this was normal; some of it was probably illegal. And the breach in trust has been irrevocable.

Positions

Position Date Person
OPM
1/20
1/20 appointed Deputy General Counsel, Office of the Director (Senior Exec Perm, ES-00, supervisory)
OPM
1/20-7/09
1/20-7/09 promoted to Acting Director «Replaced by Scott Kupor’s appointment» GovInfo
OPM
1/20
1/20 appointed Senior Advisor to the Director, Office of the Director (Schedule C, GS-15, excepted, $167,603 - $195,200) «Salary range for GS-15 in DC; LinkedIn says she is working for OMB “Made in America” initiative since March 2025»
OPM
1/20-1/20
1/20-1/20 appointed Senior Advisor to the Director for Technology and Delivery, Office of the Director (SES Noncareer, ES-00, supervisory, $195,200) «ended by promotion to CIO»
OPM
1/20
1/20 [as OPM-08] appointed Senior Advisor to the Director (SES Noncareer, ES-00, $195,200) court doc
OPM
1/20-2/18
1/20-2/18 [as OPM-05] appointed Senior Advisor to the Director for Information Technology, Office of the Director (Schedule C, NTE 2025-05-20, GS-15, supervisory, excepted, $195,200) «hired at maximum salary for GS federal employee in DC»
OPM
1/20
1/20 appointed Senior Advisor, Office of the Director (Schedule C, GS-15, excepted, $167,603 - $195,200) «Salary range for GS-15 in DC»
OPM
1/20-3/28
Left DOGE
1/20-3/28
Left DOGE
appointed Chief of Staff, Office of the Director (55-Noncareer (Senior Exec Perm), ES-00, supervisory)
OPM
1/20-c.4/30
1/20-c.4/30 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted) «reportedly left OPM in April, but as at FDIC on 4/10, so maybe end of month» NOTUS
OPM
1/20
1/20 [as OPM-02] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (NTE 2025-07-18, ED-00, excepted, volunteer) «info for alias SSA-2, who I’ve identified as him»
OPM
1/20-1/31
1/20-1/31 [as OPM-07] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (NTE 2025-07-18, ED-00, excepted, volunteer) «likely Schedule C» court doc
OPM
1/20
1/20 [as OPM-03] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (NTE 2025-07-18, ED-00, excepted, volunteer)
OPM
1/20-2/11
1/20-2/11 promoted to Acting Chief Information Officer (ES-00, supervisory, $195,200) «testified he started as Senior Advisor but was made Acting CIO same day. Made permanent CIO on 2/11» court doc
OPM
c.1/24
c.1/24 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
1/24
1/24 [as OPM-06] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted, volunteer)
OPM
1/28
1/28 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
1/28
1/28 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
1/30
1/30 appointed Senior Advisor, Office of the Director (NTE 2025-07-22, GS-15, excepted, $167,603 - $195,200) «Salary range for GS-15 in DC»
OPM
c.1/31
c.1/31 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.1/31
c.1/31 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.1/31
c.1/31 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.1/31
c.1/31 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
1/24
1/24 [as OPM-16] appointed Senior Advisor to the Director, Office of the Director (Schedule C, GS-15, excepted, $167,603 - $195,200) «Salary range is for a GS-15 in DC»
OPM
1/31
1/31 [as OPM-07] converted to permanent position Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00) «permanent position approved» court doc
OPM
2/03
2/03 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
2/03
2/03 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
2/03
2/03 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
1/30
1/30 [as OPM-14] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted) «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.2/07
c.2/07 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.2/07
c.2/07 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.2/07
c.2/07 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
2/11
2/11 promoted to Chief Information Officer, Office of the Director (SES Noncareer, ES-00, supervisory, $195,200)
OPM
2/18
2/18 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
2/18
2/18 [as OPM-05] converted to permanent position Senior Advisor to the Director for Information Technology, Office of the Director (Schedule C, GS-15, supervisory, excepted, $195,200)
OPM
2/28
2/28 appointed Senior Advisor POGO
OPM
3/XX
3/XX appointed Senior Advisor Techcrunch
OPM
3/28-3/29
3/28-3/29 demoted to Senior Advisor, Office of the Director (55-Noncareer (Senior Exec Perm), ES-00) «Her LinkedIn profile says she left OPM in March. Assuming it followed her demotion/replacement» court doc
OPM
3/28
3/28 promoted to Chief of Staff, Office of the Director (55-Noncareer (Senior Exec Perm), ES-00) court doc
OPM
6/XX
6/XX appointed «reportedly a Canadian working on temp visa which would disqualify for federal role» Wired
OPM
7/09
7/09 appointed Director Fed. News Network

Systems

System Dates Access
website 1/20- This is a stand-in for whatever website platform an agency is using
Databricks 1/28- A hosted or self-hosted service that simplifies systems for processing big Data
EHRI 1/28-2/06 The Enterprise Human Resources Integration Data Warehouse (“EHRI”) collects human resources, payroll, and training data from several dozen sources outside of OPM, including other federal agencies.
github 1/20- A service owned by Microsoft for developers to run version control on their applications and back them up to shared repositories that can be used by other developers. Github is provided as both a hosted service (at github.com) or via versions that can be installed with agency data centers (aka GitHub Enterprise or GHE). Access to Github would be expected for developers, but doesn't necessarily mean the person is a coder.
STAMP 1/24- This is a system at OPM that I do not have information about yet
USA Performance 1/20- System tracking job performance of federal employees
USA Staffing 1/20- A platform for federal agencies to recruit and onboard employees.

Events

Agency Date Event
c.1/16
c.1/16
According to his later sworn testimony, Noah Peters meets with Keenan Kmiec to outline his plan on how to use administrative leave to sideline federal employees from being able to do their work and counter or monitor DOGE’s activities at their agencies. (fuzz: Date is approximate in deposition)
c.1/16
c.1/16
Noah Peters receives a formal job offer to work at OPM. He describes it in a court disposition as being very general and vague. (fuzz: Date is approximate in deposition)
c.1/16
c.1/16
Noah Peters starts drafting two memos for OPM. One concerns temporary authorities for Schedule C and the other is on how to handle both probationary employees and admininstrative leave. These are to be issued on January 20th. (fuzz: Date is approximate in deposition)
1/17
1/17
Noah Peters recalls that he met with Amanda Scales and Brian Bjelde on this day to plan for their upcoming first day at OPM.
1/20
1/20
Acting OPM Director Charles Ezell replaces existing CIO Melvin Brown with DOGE ally Greg Hogan, who will serve as the Acting CIO.
1/20
1/20
Multiple DOGE staff start working at OPM and are listed as part of the Office of the Director.
1/20
1/20
The DOGE team moves into a secure office within OPM, installing sofa beds and armed security to prevent other staff from entry.
1/20
1/20
IT staff at OPM are pulled into a “911-esque call” requesting that “a political team” of 6 individuals must be given access to OPM systems. These include Charles Ezell, Greg Hogan, and Amanda Scales, as well as unidentified employees OPM-03 (Akash Bobba), OPM-05 (Gavin Kliger) and OPM-07 (Brian Bjelde). These DOGE staffers are granted administrative access to USAJOBS, USA Staffing, and USA Performance systems.
1/20
1/20
Career IT staff in the Office of the CIO at OPM report that their database access was completely revoked by DOGE staff working at the agency.
1/23
1/23
OPM sends out a first test email to all federal staff from its new Government-Wide Email System (GWES).
1/24
1/24
Jacob Altik and Nikhil Rajpal start working at OPM
1/26
1/26
OPM sends a second test email from its new Government-Wide Email System (GWES) to all government employees.
1/27
1/27
Charles Ezell sends an email to OPM IT staff stating that OPM-02 (Riccardo Biasini), OPM-04 (Edward Coristine), and OPM-06 (Nikhil Rajpal) “urgently” need access to several sensitive systems within the agency.
1/27
1/27
A member of the OPM union posts a Reddit message reportedly from an OPM employee which states that the email server is a piece of outside equipment and the its goal is to generate lists of all govt employees in order to send massive firing notices later.
1/27
1/27
Two anonymous federal employees file a class action lawsuit against OPM for launching the new email system without conducting a Privacy Impact Assessment for the new system
1/28
1/28
OPM sends out the “Fork in the Road” email to all federal employees offering them a chance to resign, in exchange for six month of administrative leave and protection from termination.
1/28
1/28
Wired Magazine provides an early listing of which Musk-affiliated DOGE staff now have positions at OPM. (fuzz: didn’t name Coristine or Bobba bc of their ages, but later confirmed as them)
1/28
1/28
Justin Monroe and Christopher Stanley start working at OPM as a volunteers with the job title of Expert.
1/28
1/28
OPM grants OPM-02 (Riccardo Biasini), OPM-04 (Edward Coristine), and OPM-06 (Nikhil Rajpal) full administrative access to the systems USAJOBS, USA Staffing, USA Performance, eOPF, and EHRI. This access included “[c]ode read and write permissions.”
1/30
1/30
Austin Raynor and Chris Young start working at OPM.
1/31
1/31
Federal employees at OPM report they are locked out of access to key systems by DOGE and OPM leadership.
February 2025
2/XX
2/XX
Unnamed engineers working for DOGE within OPM reportedly used Meta’s Llama AI model running locally on OPM servers to analyze responses to the “Fork in the Road” resignation offer.
2/03
2/03
Brian Bjelde holds a meeting with senior staff at OPM, directing them to prepare plans to eliminate 70% of the agency’s workforce at some unspecified point in the future. They are also told to identify 30% of staff that could be eliminated in the near term.
2/03
2/03
Several more DOGE staffers (Stephen Duarte, Christina Hanna, Bryanne-Michelle Mlodzianowski) start working at OPM. All of them come from HR backgrounds in Musk-affiliated companies.
2/05
2/05
OPM attests the Government-Wide Email System runs only on agency systems (and is not hosted in an external provider, which would be a violation of federal IT policy).
2/05
2/05
OPM issues a Privacy Impact Assessment for its Government-Wide Email System (GWES) which states responses to its messages are voluntary, brief and do not include identifying information from federal staffers.
2/06
2/06
DOGE member and lawyer Jacob Altik joins the legal defense team for the administration in Jane Does 1-2 v. Office of Personnel Management (D.D.C.) without revealing he is an DOGE staffer who is working for OPM.
2/06
2/06
The judge in Jane Does 1-2 v. Office of Personnel Management (D.D.C.) dismisses the motion for a temporary restraining order against the OPM email system since there is now a Privacy Impact Assessment available for it.
2/06
2/06
Career IT staff in the Office of the CIO at OPM have their database access restored by order of the CIO Greg Hogan. It is unclear who ordered the original revocation of access and what changes have happened in the interim.
2/12
2/12
2/13
2/13
Representing DOGE and OPM, Noah Peters finalizes mass layoffs at the USDA just before Secretary Rollins is to be sworn in that evening. When asked later by Congress about the layoffs, she deflects and says it happened before she started.
2/18
2/18
Former AirBnb executive Joe Gebbia starts working at OPM as a volunteer with the job title of Expert.
2/18
2/18
A CNN reporter shares that his FOIA request to OPM was replied to with the message “they just fired the whole privacy team.”
2/24
2/24
After Elon Musk threatens on X that employees must complete a list of 5 accomplishments and send it to OPM or risk termination, OPM hastily sends out an email to all federal staff requesting that list (without the threat) to every government employee. Widespread confusion occurs at many agencies about the legality and wisdom of this exercise.
2/25
2/25
DOGE engineer Ricardo Biasini is reported to be working on updating an “AutoRIF” software package sourced from the Department of Defense that can be used to automate Reduction-in-Force (RIF) processes at federal agencies.
c.2/26
c.2/26
During a call of human capital officers led by OPM, a representative for the GSA announces they are working on a “new federal daily check-in tool.” A test email was sent out on the same day. They announce plans to debut the tool by the first week in March. (fuzz: Date is just given as “Late February”)
2/27
2/27
Joe Gebbia announces on his social media account that he will be working on a project at OPM to modernize retirement processing and move it away from paper records currently stored at a cave in Pennsylvania.
2/28
2/28
OPM quietly amends the Privacy Impact Assessment for its Government-Wide Email System (GWES) to remove declarations that responses are voluntary. This is after it had to concede that federal staff did not have to reply to the Five Things email because of the PIA.
2/28
2/28
Judge Alsup ruling in AFL-CIO vs. OPM (N.D. Cal.) issues a temporary restraining order that termination of probationary workers at 6 agencies was unlawful and that they should be restored to work immediately.
March 2025
3/01
3/01
All government employees receive a second email telling them they must list their accomplishments every Monday by 11:59pm. This does not contain a threat of termination, but it is also no longer reported as an optional exercise. Staff working on confidential or classified activities are supposed to reply to the email but redact their work.
3/01
3/01
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) starts an audit of how DOGE has handled data at several agencies.
3/04
3/04
In response to recent court rulings that determined that OPM exceeded its authority, OPM quietly revises its initial memo that required all federal agencies to send lists of probationary employees to the agency. It also downplays suggestions that the lists should be used for deciding staffing levels.
3/10
3/10
The OPM Inspector General responds to questions from Democrats in Congress by stating his office will start investigating DOGE’s email server and its IT practices at the agency.
3/18
3/18
A lawyer for the plaintiffs accuses the Department of Justice of deliberately misrepresenting Jacob Altik’s participation in the defense “perhaps to preserve the illusion that OPM’s counsel were ignorant of what OPM was doing with the Government-Wide Email System, or perhaps to obscure the role of DOGE and the White House in this case.”
3/20
3/20
President Trump issues an executive order that orders OPM to redefine regulations so that it would give them more power to directly terminate employees at other agencies.
3/24
3/24
Ruling in American Federation of Teachers et al v. Bessent et al, Judge Boardman issues a preliminary injunction against access by DOGE staff to internal systems at OPM by DOGE. However, he still allows access for DOGE-affiliated leadership at the agency including Charles Ezell, Amanda Scales and Greg Hogan.
3/28
3/28
For reasons that aren’t entirely clear, Amanda Scales is replaced as the Chief of Staff at OPM by James Sullivan. Amanda changes to a Senior Advisor position at the agency. (fuzz: Amanda Scales reports on her LinkedIn that she left DOGE in March, so this might have been the cause)
April 2025
4/03
4/03
Scott Kupor, the nominee to lead OPM, assured senators in a confirmation hearing that he believes strongly in data privacy and respecting the humanity and dignity of the federal workforce.
4/07
4/07
In a 2-1 vote, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lifted a stay against DOGE data access at the Treasury, OPM and Department of Education imposed in the case American Federation of Teachers v. Bessent et al.
4/11
4/11
The plaintiffs in AFGE, AFL-CIO, et. al vs. OPM file a motion asking for the testimony of Noah Peters to be disregarded because they argue it is misleading and possibly fabricated in certain parts.
4/16
4/16
Noah Peters at OPM denies the CFPB request made by Adam Martinez as well as Jeremy Lewin and Gavin Kliger to conduct an “emergency” RIF at the CFPB which would only give employees 30 days before their termination.
May 2025
5/09
5/09
OPM is reportedly poised to launch a rebranded version of the formerly-named AutoRIF software for automating the process of designating staff for mass layoffs. It was modernized and given a web interface by DOGE engineer Riccardo Biasini.
5/09
5/09
OPM reports it will rolling out a Online Retirement Application (ORA) system which replaces the paper-based system for federal departments served by the National Finance Center and Interior Business Center. This was a program originally started in the Biden Administration that is being accelerated without pilot programs.
5/30
5/30
The judge in AFL-CIO vs. OPM examines Greg Hogan on the stand and asks if he had followed the principle of least privilege in providing system access to DOGE. The judge’s questions indicated that she seemed to be leaning towards a issuing a preliminary injunction against DOGE’s “chaotic” access to systems at OPM.
June 2025
6/09
6/09
Judge Cote, presiding over AFGE v. OPM, grants a preliminary injunction against DOGE having access to systems at OPM and orders them to destroy any information they have copied. She finds that OPM failed to follow proper procedures for granting access.
July 2025
7/09
7/09
Scott Kupor is confirmed by the Senate to be the new Director of OPM, replacing Charles Ezell who had been serving in an acting capacity since January 20th.
7/21
7/21
Scott Kupor states that he expects to eliminate roughly 1000 positions at OPM (or about a third of its staff) by the end of the year.