Office of Personnel Management

One of the ways in which DOGE surprised everybody was how it turned a relatively sleepy agency into a weapon against the entire government bureaucracy. Created by law in 1978, OPM’s main role before now was to standardize government policies around personnel and to offer shared services for human capital like the federal health plans. It also tracks all the paperwork around hiring, promotions, changes and retirement. And so, for most federal staff, their main interactions with OPM were receiving paperwork they were hired, fired or retired; or picking a health plan; or looking at the rules around various practices. But, all the other aspects of human resources were handled by their own agencies. Federal staff are hired to their specific agencies, their performance rankings are defined by their agency, they’re promoted by their agencies, they’re paid by their agencies, they follow the HR policies of their agencies. OPM provides the guidance, but it’s the agencies that implement it. This is why OPM’s turn towards the dark side has been so confounding. Very early on, DOGE concentrated a large number of staff within OPM to capture control of the centralized databases and install a new email server to send/receive messages from every federal worker. The acting director was forced out and replaced by Charles Ezell, who then let DOGE wall off an area and keep out permanent agency staff. DOGE also brought in a slew of HR executives from startups who seemingly expected the agency to work for the entire federal government in the same way that HR operates within a single company. And so, they started acting like OPM had more centralized authority: ordering workers to the “five things” email; blasting commands to human capital officers at other agencies; asking for lists of workers so they could command agencies to fire probationary workers and short-cut established procedures for reductions in force. OPM used to be deliberative and formal with its rulemaking - the new OPM was fond of sending out memos to all agencies on Wednesdays demanding a response by Friday. None of this was normal; some of it was probably illegal. And the breach in trust has been irrevocable.

Positions

Position Date Person
OPM
1/20
1/20 appointed Deputy General Counsel, Office of the Director (Senior Exec Perm, ES-00, supervisory)
OPM
1/20-7/09
1/20-7/09 promoted to Acting Director «Replaced by Scott Kupor’s appointment» GovInfo
OPM
1/20
1/20 appointed Senior Advisor to the Director, Office of the Director (Schedule C, GS-15, excepted, $167,603 - $195,200) «Salary range for GS-15 in DC»
OPM
1/20-1/20
1/20-1/20 appointed Senior Advisor to the Director for Technology and Delivery, Office of the Director (SES Noncareer, ES-00, supervisory, $195,200) «ended by promotion to CIO»
OPM
1/20
1/20 [as OPM-08] appointed Senior Advisor to the Director (SES Noncareer, ES-00, $195,200) court doc
OPM
1/20-2/18
1/20-2/18 [as OPM-05] appointed Senior Advisor to the Director for Information Technology, Office of the Director (Schedule C, NTE 2025-05-20, GS-15, supervisory, excepted, $195,200) «hired at maximum salary for GS federal employee in DC»
OPM
1/20
1/20 appointed Senior Advisor, Office of the Director (Schedule C, GS-15, excepted, $167,603 - $195,200) «Salary range for GS-15 in DC»
OPM
1/20-3/28
Left DOGE
1/20-3/28
Left DOGE
appointed Chief of Staff, Office of the Director (55-Noncareer (Senior Exec Perm), ES-00, supervisory)
OPM
1/20-c.4/30
1/20-c.4/30 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted) «reportedly left OPM in April, but as at FDIC on 4/10, so maybe end of month» NOTUS
OPM
1/20
1/20 [as OPM-02] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (NTE 2025-07-18, ED-00, excepted, volunteer) «info for alias SSA-2, who I’ve identified as him»
OPM
1/20-1/31
1/20-1/31 [as OPM-07] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (NTE 2025-07-18, ED-00, excepted, volunteer) «likely Schedule C» court doc
OPM
1/20
1/20 [as OPM-03] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (NTE 2025-07-18, ED-00, excepted, volunteer)
OPM
1/20-2/11
1/20-2/11 promoted to Acting Chief Information Officer (ES-00, supervisory, $195,200) «testified he started as Senior Advisor but was made Acting CIO same day. Made permanent CIO on 2/11» court doc
OPM
c.1/24
c.1/24 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
1/24
1/24 [as OPM-06] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted, volunteer)
OPM
1/28
1/28 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
1/28
1/28 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
1/30
1/30 appointed Senior Advisor, Office of the Director (NTE 2025-07-22, GS-15, excepted, $167,603 - $195,200) «Salary range for GS-15 in DC»
OPM
c.1/31
c.1/31 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.1/31
c.1/31 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.1/31
c.1/31 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.1/31
c.1/31 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
1/24
1/24 [as OPM-16] appointed Senior Advisor to the Director, Office of the Director (Schedule C, GS-15, excepted, $167,603 - $195,200) «Salary range is for a GS-15 in DC»
OPM
1/31
1/31 [as OPM-07] converted to permanent position Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00) «permanent position approved» court doc
OPM
2/03
2/03 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
2/03
2/03 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
2/03
2/03 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
1/30
1/30 [as OPM-14] appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted) «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.2/07
c.2/07 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.2/07
c.2/07 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
c.2/07
c.2/07 unknown «Start date guessed from system access»
OPM
2/11
2/11 promoted to Chief Information Officer, Office of the Director (SES Noncareer, ES-00, supervisory, $195,200)
OPM
2/18
2/18 appointed Expert, Office of the Director (ED-00, excepted)
OPM
2/18
2/18 [as OPM-05] converted to permanent position Senior Advisor to the Director for Information Technology, Office of the Director (Schedule C, GS-15, supervisory, excepted, $195,200)
OPM
2/28
2/28 appointed Senior Advisor POGO
OPM
3/XX
3/XX appointed Senior Advisor Techcrunch
OPM
3/28-3/29
3/28-3/29 demoted to Senior Advisor, Office of the Director (55-Noncareer (Senior Exec Perm), ES-00) «Her LinkedIn profile says she left OPM in March. Assuming it followed her demotion/replacement» court doc
OPM
3/28
3/28 promoted to Chief of Staff, Office of the Director (55-Noncareer (Senior Exec Perm), ES-00) court doc
OPM
6/XX
6/XX appointed «reportedly a Canadian working on temp visa which would disqualify for federal role» Wired
OPM
7/09
7/09 appointed Director Fed. News Network

Systems

System Dates Access
website 1/20- This is a stand-in for whatever website platform an agency is using
Databricks 1/28- A hosted or self-hosted service that simplifies systems for processing big Data
EHRI 1/28-2/06 The Enterprise Human Resources Integration Data Warehouse (“EHRI”) collects human resources, payroll, and training data from several dozen sources outside of OPM, including other federal agencies.
github 1/20- A service owned by Microsoft for developers to run version control on their applications and back them up to shared repositories that can be used by other developers. Github is provided as both a hosted service (at github.com) or via versions that can be installed with agency data centers (aka GitHub Enterprise or GHE). Access to Github would be expected for developers, but doesn't necessarily mean the person is a coder.
STAMP 1/24- This is a system at OPM that I do not have information about yet
USA Performance 1/20- System tracking job performance of federal employees
USA Staffing 1/20- A platform for federal agencies to recruit and onboard employees.

Events

Agency Date Event
c.1/16
c.1/16
Noah Peters outlines with Keenan Kmiec the plan on how to use administrative leave to sideline federal employees (fuzz: Date is approximate in deposition)
c.1/16
c.1/16
Noah Peters receives a job offer to work at the OPM. He describes it as very general and vague. (fuzz: Date is approximate in deposition)
c.1/16
c.1/16
Noah Peters starts working on two memos around temporary authorities for Schedule C and another on probationary employees and admininstrative leave. These are to be issued on January 20th. (fuzz: Date is approximate in deposition)
1/17
1/17
Noah Peters recalls that he met with Amanda Scales and Brian Bjelde to plan for their upcoming first day at OPM.
1/20
1/20
Acting OPM Director Charles Ezell replaces existing CIO Melvin Brown with Greg Hogan in an acting capacity
1/20
1/20
Multiple DOGE staff start working at OPM within the Director’s office
1/20
1/20
The DOGE team moves into a secure office within OPM, installing sofa beds and armed security
1/20
1/20
IT staff at OPM are pulled into a “911-esque call” requesting that “a political team” of 6 individuals must be given access to OPM systems. There are granted administrative access to USAJOBS, USA Staffing, and USA Performance.
1/20
1/20
Career IT staff in the Office of the CIO at OPM have their database access revoked.
1/23
1/23
OPM sends out a first test email from its new government-wide email system
1/24
1/24
Jacob Altik and Nikhil Rajpal start working at the OPM
1/26
1/26
OPM sends a second test email from its new government-wide email system to all government employees
1/27
1/27
Charles Ezell sends an email stating that OPM-02 (Riccardo Biasini), OPM-04 (Edward Coristine), and OPM-06 (Nikhil Rajpal) “urgently” needed access to several sensitive systems within the agency.
1/27
1/27
A member of the OPM union posts a Reddit message reportedly from an OPM employee stating that the email server is a piece of outside equipment and the goal is to generate lists of all govt employees to send massive firing notices later.
1/27
1/27
Two anonymous federal employees file a class action lawsuit against OPM for launching the new email system without conducting a Privacy Impact Assessment for the new system
1/28
1/28
OPM sends out the “Fork in the Road” email to all federal employees offering them a chance to resign
1/28
1/28
Wired Magazine provides an early listing of which Musk-affiliated DOGE staff now have positions at OPM (fuzz: didn’t name Coristine or Bobba bc of their ages, but later confirmed as them)
1/28
1/28
Justin Monroe and Christopher Stanley start working at OPM as a volunteer Expert
1/28
1/28
OPM grants OPM-02 (Riccardo Biasini), OPM-04 (Edward Coristine), and OPM-06 (Nikhil Rajpal) full administrative access to the systems USAJOBS, USA Staffing, USA Performance, eOPF, and EHRI. This access included “[c]ode read and write permissions.”
1/30
1/30
Austin Raynor and Chris Young start working at the OPM
1/31
1/31
Federal employees at OPM are locked out of access to key systems by DOGE and OPM leadership
February 2025
2/XX
2/XX
Engineers working for DOGE within OPM used Meta’s LLama AI model locally to analyze responses to the Fork in the Road resignation offer
2/03
2/03
Brian Bjelde holds a meeting with senior staff at OPM, directing them to prepare plans to eliminate 70% of the agency’s workforce at some point in the future. They are also told to identify 30% of staff that could be eliminated in the near term.
2/03
2/03
Several more DOGE staffers (Stephen Duarte, Christina Hanna, Bryanne-Michelle Mlodzianowski) start working at OPM. All of them come from HR backgrounds in Musk-affiliated companies.
2/05
2/05
OPM attests the government-wide email system runs on agency systems
2/05
2/05
OPM issues a Privacy Impact Assessment for its Government-Wide Email System (GWES) that states responses are voluntary, brief and do not include identifying information
2/06
2/06
DOGE member and lawyer Jacob Altik joins the case for the defense in Jane Does 1-2 v. Office of Personnel Management (D.D.C.) without revealing he is an OPM employee working for DOGE
2/06
2/06
The court dismisses the motion for a temporary restraining order against the OPM email system since there is now a PIA available for it
2/06
2/06
Career IT staff in the Office of the CIO at OPM have their database access restored by order of Greg Hogan
2/12
2/12
2/18
2/18
Former AirBnb executive Joe Gebbia starts working as an Expert at OPM
2/18
2/18
CNN reporter shares that a FOIA request about DOGE was replied to with “they just fired the whole privacy team”
2/24
2/24
After Elon Musk threatens on X that employees must complete a list of 5 accomplishments and send it to OPM or risk termination, OPM sends out an email requesting that list (without the threat) to every government employee. Widespread confusion occurs at many agenices.
2/25
2/25
DOGE engineer Ricardo Biasini is reported to be working on updating software to automate Reduction-in-Force (RIF) processes
c.2/26
c.2/26
During a call of human capital officers led by OPM, a representative for the GSA announces they are working on a “new federal daily check-in tool.” A test email was sent out on the same day. They announce plans to debut the tool by the first week in March. (fuzz: Date is just given as “Late February”)
2/27
2/27
Joe Gebbia announces on his social media account that he will be working on a project at the OPM to modernize retirement processing and move it away from paper records
2/28
2/28
OPM amends the Privacy Impact Assessment for its Government-Wide Email System (GWES) to remove declarations that responses are voluntary.
2/28
2/28
Judge Alsup ruling in AFL-CIO vs. OPM (N.D. Cal.), issues a temporary restraining order that termination of probationary workers at 6 agencies were unlawful
March 2025
3/01
3/01
All government employees receive a second email telling them they must list their accomplishments every Monday by 11:59pm
3/01
3/01
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) starts an audit of how DOGE handled data at several agencies
3/04
3/04
In response to recent rulings, the OPM quietly revises its initial memo requiring federal agencies to send lists of probationary employees to the agency and downplays suggestions that the lists should be used for deciding staffing levels
3/10
3/10
The OPM Inspector General responds to questions from Democrats in Congress by stating his office will start investigating DOGE’s servers and practices
3/18
3/18
A lawyer for the plaintiffs accuses the DOJ of misrepresenting Altik’s participation “perhaps to preserve the illusion that OPM’s counsel were ignorant of what OPM was doing with the Government-Wide Email System, or perhaps to obscure the role of DOGE and the White House in this case.”
3/20
3/20
President Trump issues an executive order that requests OPM to redefine regulations to give them more power to terminate employees at other agencies
3/24
3/24
Ruling in American Federation of Teachers et al v. Bessent et al, Judge Boardman issues a preliminary injunction against access to internal systems at OPM by DOGE staff, but still allows it for OPM leadership including Ezell, Scales and Hogan
3/28
3/28
For reasons that aren’t entirely clear, Amanda Scales is replaced as the Chief of Staff at OPM by James Sullivan. Amanda changes to a Senior Advisor position at the agency.
April 2025
4/03
4/03
Scott Kupor, the nominee to lead OPM, assured senators that he believes strong in data privacy and respecting the humanity and dignity of the workforce
4/07
4/07
In a 2-1 vote, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lifted a stay against DOGE data access at the Treasury, OPM and Department of Education imposed in the case American Federation of Teachers v. Bessent (D. Maryland 2025)
4/11
4/11
The plaintiffs in AFGE, AFL-CIO, et. al vs. OPM file a motion asking for the testimony of Noah Peters to be thrown out because they argue it is misleading and possibly a fabrication in parts
4/16
4/16
Noah Peters at OPM denies the CFPB request for an “emergency” 30-day notice for a RIF at the CFPB
May 2025
5/09
5/09
OPM is set to launch a rebranded version of the formerly-named AutoRIF software for automating the process of designating staff in mass layoffs that also includes a new web interface.
5/09
5/09
OPM reports it will rolling out a Online Retirement Application (ORA) system which replaces the paper-based system for federal departments served by the National Finance Center and Interior Business Center. This was a program originally started in the Biden Administration that is being accelerated without pilot programs.
5/30
5/30
The judge in AFL-CIO vs. OPM examined Greg Hogan on the stand and asked if he had followed the principle of least privilege in awarding access to DOGE. She seemed to be leaning towards a issuing a preliminary injunction against DOGE’s “chaotic” access to systems at OPM.
June 2025
6/09
6/09
Judge Cote, presiding over AFGE v. OPM, grants a preliminary injunction against DOGE having access to systems at OPM and orders them to destroy any information they have copied, due to her finding that OPM failed to follow proper procedures for granting access.
July 2025
7/09
7/09
Scott Kupor is confirmed by the Senate to be the new Director of OPM, replacing Charles Ezell who had been serving in an acting capacity since January 20th